Monday, June 28, 2010

For the Social Good

A few weeks ago I had the privilege to attend the Mashable Media Summit in NYC with Jessy Yancey. During the conference there was definitely a lot of talk of using social media for the social good. There was one particular company that I wanted to highlight:


EDWARD NORTON'S CROWDRISE.COM

Norton observed:
• Organizations were not effectively using contemporary web-based social networking tools to enhance their fundraising efforts in a meaningful way or to engage people who were supporting them.
• Organizations were not using dynamic, cutting-edge technology to reach a new generation of people in a productive way. Younger people were adopting these tools, but struggling to find a way to use them productively.

So he and a group of other partners created Crowdrise. The basic goals of Crowdrise:
• To provide a platform that works in complementary ways in multiple directions
• To develop a way to create team efforts in fund-raising for corporations and organizations involved in social responsibility

"Our conviction is that a lot of social networking is in essence about personal narrative ... people take pride in what they are doing, their personal narrative matters, and they want to share it with other people. Our extension of that is simply to encourage people to plant a flag, raise a fist, take pride in what they care about, what they are engaged in and engage other people in it."
– Edward Norton

What makes Crowdrise a great solution? They have found a way to incorporate the things that people love about social media ... the connection, the competition, the fun, the humor ... into a way to help support a good cause. Better yet, into a way to help support a lot of good causes. And according to Norton ... it only takes about 15 minutes to setup a project.

I definitely encourage you to take a look at the site and learn more about it.

Tuesday, June 15, 2010

3 Things I Learned at the Mashable Media Summit


I was fortunate enough to attend the Mashable Media Summit in New York last week, which they put on in partnership with CNN. It was filled with great takeaways, cool resources and even plain old funny content (what else can you expect when the speaker roster includes representatives of The Onion, College Humor and URDB?), but here are the top 3 things I feel were most important with applications to content developers like myself, small businesses and anyone who uses social media:

1. People want content that comes to them.
Both sportscaster Len Berman and Motorola representative Christy Wyatt each voiced this message in different ways. Len was referring to the 2008 presidential election and hearing young people say they don't turn to the news anymore, but rather the news now comes to them – especially through Facebook and Twitter feeds. "There's no faster way to get the news and information than on Twitter," he said. "It's on Twitter before it's anywhere else." Keep in mind this is coming from someone who grew to fame using traditional media, but has since expanded his horizons and opened professional doors using the web as his primary voice. He adds that the instant two-way conversation is the best thing about new media.

Christy, who was hawking the platform Motoblur (successfully, I might add – every attendee received a free smartphone!), was talking about the rise of mobile web. "People don't want to go to data – they want data to come to them," she said, comparing the time-consuming, battery-draining installation process (such as mobile apps, an obvious criticism of the iPhone) to the ease of directly connecting (mobile web). With more and more people using their phones as mini computers, users want mobile-friendly websites that use push notifications – almost like a text message – rather than pull notifications reserved for your desktop computer. Again, the user doesn't have to actively seek out information – their phone (or the social connections within their phone) sends it right to their pocket.


2. Foursquare is the next big thing. (Probably.)
I've said it before, and so have my colleagues – businesses shouldn't ignore Foursquare. But even though some may blast it (Time magazine calls it "the next generation of creepy social networking"), enough early adopters – including major brands – are supporting it that Mashable and others are calling it the next Twitter. As one moderator said, "The whole experience of checking in is still foreign to people, but you can compare that to the two years Twitter spent explaining why they were tweeting."

And more than 1.5 million users are checking in, and often. But what's so refreshing about founder Dennis Crowley (as compared to the lack of privacy concerns of Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg) is this quote:
People that get most concerned about privacy are not the ones that have used [Foursquare]. I'm not a fan of the passive check-in model.
This means that as "creepy" as Time considers this new social application, the founder has spoken out against what I personally consider the creepier versions of location-based social networking, those that use your GPS to track where you are and automatically check in for you. No thanks. I like Foursquare for the same reason I like the e-newsletters I receive – they're opt-in, and it's my decision to actively check in/sign up.

The Foursquare discussion gave some insight into their business model. They've gone from six employees to 25 employees in the past year. They just had their developers take two weeks off from developing new features to focus on fixing functionality problems. (Don't we wish we all had time to focus solely on fixing problems?) And though they did develop an iPhone app, they didn't develop apps for the Android or Blackberry operating systems. Instead, they spent time developing their API (essentially, the interface that programmers use to create third-party applications – like Facebook Connect or TweetDeck) in hopes that someone else would develop the apps for them. And it worked.

Of course, we're not all that lucky, having developers knocking at our doors to create applications for us. But there's more in the works for Foursquare, including the idea of rewarding frequent visitors other than the mayor, so I highly recommend checking out what Foursquare can do for your business. Need an example? Listen to what Robert Smith Hotel has done with social media – and how well it's worked.


3. Content is still king – but find your niche.
My professional title has the word "content" in it, and so does my company's logo: Custom Media, Custom Content. So it's refreshing to hear these speakers constantly say things like, "Great content is a terrible thing to waste."

That quote comes from Chris Bruzzo with Starbucks, and he had a plethora of social media success stories. But throughout this conference, no matter who was speaking, content remained at the forefront of conversation. Mashable talked about how their team posts 25+ new pieces of content per day. College Humor's CEO discussed their success with branded content. CNN covered user-generated content. Even Foursquare was called "socially filtered location content."

In fact, I found the discussion between CNN and Mashable CEO Pete Cashmore (swoon) to be probably the best out of all of the great sessions. I liked it because they didn't always see eye to eye, provoking some of the best conversations. Television content is broad and general, web content is passion-based. CNN spent two years developing an iPhone app, while Mashable instantly offered up an iPad app that has since undergone six revisions. Even as user-generated content soars, CNN says it will never rely entirely on iReporters for a story: "If we let it go to purely user-generated content, it would be the lowest-common denominator," Sanjay Gupta said.

Two of the commonly used, relatively unknown (to me) phrases I heard were "curating" and "niche verticals". Mashable does both. They curate content, rather than aggregate it – select relevant news from throughout the web while giving it their own spin. As far as their niche, social media, they don't just confine themselves to that subject; rather, they will examine it from all angles, thoroughly and purposefully. A wide range of mini-topics all spin off from the central, core subject – causing what they and others called a niche vertical.

At the end of the day, your site is only as good as your content is. If you sell apples, I don't expect you to tell me how to grow oranges. But I do expect you to tell me how to grow apples, offer apple recipes, tell me the difference between a Granny Smith and a Red Delicious, and let me know how to reach you to buy apples – or just to ask a question. As the era of social media expands, remember: It's all about making connections.

Want more? Check out Mashable's recap of the Media Summit – includes complete video of all major speakers.

Thursday, June 10, 2010

Vanity URLs for Facebook

Do you admin a page in Facebook and have at least 25 fans (i.e. 25 people that have liked your page)? If so, this qualifies your page for a custom or vanity URL. This can be helpful for marketing purposes or even just in those situations when you find yourself in a "real-life" conversation with someone who's interested in liking your page but neither of you have a computer handy. Just let them know your custom URL, and that person can easily find your page by adding it after the slash in their address bar when logged into Facebook.

For example: www.facebook.com/returntoharmony

Obtaining a vanity URL is super easy. Just go here (www.facebook.com/username) and click on Set a User Name for Your Page. (This is also where you would go to set up a user name for your personal profile.) A drop down menu will appear; select the page you want to create the URL for then type in your desired name. Once you select a name for your page, it cannot be changed, so be certain of the following:

  • That you love the name and can live with it as long as your page exists.
  • That it makes sense for the people who like or are fans of your page.
  • That it contains key words that make it easily searchable.
  • That everything is spelled and capitalized correctly.

Then click the Check Availability button. You will then receive confirmation that your URL was accepted, or notification that the URL is no longer available. If it's no longer available, try changing the position of the words, shortening words, or using similar words and try again. Chances are there will be something that does the trick.



Wednesday, June 2, 2010

Associated Press Stylebook and Social Media

I woke up this morning, went to my desk and slouched down in a my chair with a hot cup of coffee (black, please). One of my first stops is always the Social Media guide website, Mashable. Blurry-eyed I read the trending headline, "AP Stylebook Adds 42 New Guidelines for Social Media."

Not sure what the AP Stylebook is? Here's the abridged version: The AP Stylebook is typically used by reporters and editors as a guide for grammar, punctuation, usage and some general best practices tidbits tossed in there for good measure.

Okay, so now that that we're all on the same page, what are the 42 new guidelines?

A lot of them are basic acronyms that almost all of us have used at least once in our lives. The list was not without a few surprises though:

  • POS - Parent over shoulder. Used by teenagers and children to indicate, in an IM (Instant Message) conversation, that a parent is approaching.

  • LOL - Laugh out loud or Laughing out loud. Use to indicate that the sender has found something funny. See also ROFL.

  • ROFL - Rolling on the floor laughing. One step beyond LOL.

Up until recently I've had another definition for POS and I've always wondered if LOL and ROFL were equals or not. Thanks AP Stylebook for clearing all of that up for me!

A few definitions also slipped their way into the book:

  • Microsite - a tightly focused group of Web pages typically dedicated to a single topic, product or service.

  • Website - a location on the World Wide Web that maintains one or more pages at a specific address.

I think it's great that AP has finally adapted to the rest of the world by accepting website as one word instead of two (Web site). I can't help but wonder why all of the other 'web' words are still two words - Web page, Web feed ... but I digress.

So what does all of this mean for me? What does this mean for you?

Regardless of who you are and what you do, you're going to have some exposure to the print media and you're going to be seeing these new rules and guidelines very soon if not already.

Some of the things laid out in the guidebook are great, but there are a few things that make me raise an eyebrow.

I'm scared to see the day that the front page of the newspaper is written like a Twitter post.

"Thx 4 the retweet. LOL."
*The words in bold are in fact included among the new 42 entries.

I'm sure many will see these changes as progressive and necessary and are championing the decision makers that voted to adopt these entries. And to those people, I say, "Good riddance."

Don't get me wrong, I strongly believe that these acronyms and rules have their place (see also: Urban Dictionary) - I just don't believe that that place is in the AP Stylebook.

This is Journalism that we're talking about. Instead of raising the bar and holding society to a higher standard, the AP Stylebook has lowered the bar by adopting these rules.

G2G.

. m